theonetruesmiler: “ nerdgasming: “ undercover-moffat: “ madamewo: “ lexicalbutsecretlynoalcohollager: “ davidrazi: “ defcia: “ true ” Girls always bitch about this, sure, but it’s not like it’s any better for guys. You think I wanna be some ultra...
theonetruesmiler: “ nerdgasming: “ undercover-moffat: “ madamewo: “ lexicalbutsecretlynoalcohollager: “ davidrazi: “ defcia: “ true ” Girls always bitch about this, sure, but it’s not like it’s any better for guys. You think I wanna be some ultra...
theonetruesmiler: “ nerdgasming: “ undercover-moffat: “ madamewo: “ lexicalbutsecretlynoalcohollager: “ davidrazi: “ defcia: “ true ” Girls always bitch about this, sure, but it’s not like it’s any better for guys. You think I wanna be some ultra...

theonetruesmiler:

nerdgasming:

undercover-moffat:

madamewo:

lexicalbutsecretlynoalcohollager:

davidrazi:

defcia:

true

Girls always bitch about this, sure, but it’s not like it’s any better for guys. You think I wanna be some ultra macho beefcake?
There’s a reason I always pick female character models in video games.

it got better

I really don’t understand why people bitch about female armor in video games… It’s NOT REAL

Because it’s only the women who are scantily clad, so, you know, sexist. Even if it’s “meant for guys”, I would prefer not having misrepresentations of women as sex objects.

But it’s not real. They aren’t real women. Most of the time they aren’t even human and are shaped like Barbies. Personally I like my female armor better than the male.

354,224 notes
  1. jdeko reblogged this from alledherlu-q-pereon and added:
    i would just want to make the female character flat chested and in the rare occasion it matters have her be biologically...
  2. alledherlu-q-pereon reblogged this from nerdiest-cowboy and added:
    Also I like these types of female characters *as* idealised female power fantasies. It’s not a double standard, op is...
  3. janersm reblogged this from circuitboardstitches
  4. toofrandom reblogged this from cookiekitten91
  5. cyarique reblogged this from cyarique
  6. mrworldwidebutwithdaddyissues reblogged this from penandinkprincess
  7. catcatb0y said: -statement is about you not separating yourself from your character, so clearly it does have SOME impact on reality or you wouldn’t “play as girls because you don’t want to look like a macho beefcake.”
  8. catcatb0y said: @davidrazi even then, your whole argument is that, yes, there is sexism on both sides (although it can be argued, again, that having more muscle is typically associated with strength). The armor is supposed to make you look nice! That doesn’t mean you’re a super macho beefcake beneath it. It’s not even that bad you have issues. ^ does that sound like a good fucking argument to you? Cause that’s your statement genderbended. Even then, your whole “it affects guys, too”-
  9. catcatb0y said: It makes you look like an incel
  10. catcatb0y said: Yes, absolutely fictitious worlds are not real, nor do they have the direct power to influence real life. However, stereotypes and treatments of characters- specifically the huge trend in sexualizing female characters (for male appeal) does have an effect over time. Many of these fantasy enjoyers have a tendency to treat girls in real life like the female characters they see on screen- i.e. as one-dimensional, sexualized props. Saying “it’s not real” means Jack shit and-
  11. catcatb0y said: @davidrazi yeah it’s not real it’s drawn by (cishet) guys who want to reduce women to ass and tiddies that the whole fucking problem
  12. davidrazi said: It’s not real, idiot. That armour doesn’t need to “protect” anything. Learn to separate fantasy from reality, cause you have mental problems.
  13. catcatb0y reblogged this from davidrazi and added:
    Ultimately the difference is the Ultra macho beefcake look is usually a (male) projection fantasy, whereas the ‘sexy,...
  14. defcia posted this